Current:Home > MyWoman denied abortion at a Kansas hospital sues, alleging her life was put at risk -MoneyTrend
Woman denied abortion at a Kansas hospital sues, alleging her life was put at risk
View
Date:2025-04-14 14:15:12
MISSION, Kan. (AP) — A woman who was denied an abortion at a Kansas hospital after suffering a pregnancy complication that her attorneys say put her at risk of sepsis and even death is suing in a case that already prompted a federal investigation.
Mylissa Farmer, of Joplin, Missouri, filed the lawsuit Tuesday in federal court against the University of Kansas Health System and the public oversight body that governs its operations.
Federal law requires emergency rooms to treat or stabilize patients who are in active labor and provide a medical transfer to another hospital if they don’t have the staff or resources to treat them. Medical facilities must comply with the law if they accept Medicare funding.
But Farmer’s suit alleges that the hospital in Kansas City, Kansas, broke that law and a state anti-discrimination act. A hospital spokeswoman said that attorneys are reviewing the lawsuit and that a statement might be issued later.
The suit said Farmer was “overjoyed” to be pregnant before her water broke on Aug. 2, 2022. She was just shy of 18 week’s gestation.
It was the worst possible timing: Roe v. Wade had been overturned five weeks earlier, and that very day, Kansas residents were voting on a measure that would have allowed the Republican-controlled Legislature to tighten restrictions or ban the procedure outright.
The race had just been called and the measure had been rejected by the time she showed up at the University of Kansas Hospital. She’d already been to Freeman Health System in Joplin, Missouri, earlier that day. But a Missouri abortion ban had just taken effect. The ban provides exceptions in medical emergencies and when necessary to save the life of the mother, but that summer doctors were still struggling to understand what qualified as an exception.
A federal investigation found that doctors at both hospitals told Farmer that her fetus would not survive, that her amniotic fluid had emptied and that she was at risk for serious infection or losing her uterus. But the investigation found neither hospital would terminate the pregnancy because a fetal heartbeat was still detectable.
The suit said the doctors at Freeman cited the statewide abortion ban.
A doctor at the University of Kansas initially suggested ending the pregnancy by inducing labor so she would have a chance to hold and say goodbye to her daughter, whom she and her now-husband already had named Maeve. But the suit said that doctor later returned and said that her medical judgment had been overridden and that she could not induce labor because it would be too “risky” in the “heated” “political” environment.
The suit alleged that the University of Kansas Hospital “deserted Ms. Farmer in her time of crisis.” It said she was turned away “with no treatment whatsoever — not even antibiotics or Tylenol.” The suit said that staff didn’t check her temperatures or her pain.
She then returned to the hospital in Joplin, where she was admitted for observation as her health “continued to deteriorate,” the suit said. Freeman Health System was not named as a defendant.
On Aug. 4, she drove several hours to a clinic in Illinois while in labor and underwent an abortion there.
But the suit said the prolonged miscarriage had caused a preventable infection. She was unable to work for many months and lost her home because of the lost wages, the suit said.
Farmer said previously that the experience was so traumatic that she got her tubes tied.
The suit said the woman thought the University of Kansas Hospital would be “her lifeline.”
“Instead, hospital staff told her that, while they had the ability to provide life-saving care, and thought it was necessary, they would not do so,” the suit said. As a result, she then endured hours of agonizing labor in her car, terrified that her miscarriage would not only end her pregnancy but also take her life.”
veryGood! (27745)
Related
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Two's company, three's allowed in the dating show 'Couple to Throuple'
- Houston megachurch to have service of ‘healing and restoration’ a week after deadly shooting
- Don’t Miss Kate Spade Outlet’s Presidents’ Day Sale Featuring Bags Up to 90% Off, Just in Time for Spring
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Tiger Woods Withdraws From Genesis Invitational Golf Tournament Over Illness
- Boy who was staying at Chicago migrant shelter died of sepsis, autopsy says
- You Won't Be Able to Get These Photos of Lenny Kravitz Off Your Mind
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Victoria Beckham Offers Hilarious Response to Question About Becoming a Grandmother
Ranking
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Who are the past winners of the NBA Slam Dunk contest?
- Hilary Swank Cuddles Twin Babies Ohm and Aya in Sweet New Photo
- State governments looking to protect health-related data as it’s used in abortion battle
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Chinese electric carmakers are taking on Europeans on their own turf — and succeeding
- Trump avoids ‘corporate death penalty,’ but his business will still get slammed
- The Murderous Mindf--k at the Heart of Lover, Stalker, Killer
Recommendation
Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
Satellite shows California snow after Pineapple Express, but it didn't replenish snowpack
Why Paris Hilton's World as a Mom of 2 Kids Is Simply the Sweetest
Trump rails against New York fraud ruling as he faces fines that could exceed half-a-billion dollars
Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
Fear of God Athletics reveals first foray into college basketball with Indiana and Miami
Houston megachurch to have service of ‘healing and restoration’ a week after deadly shooting
Here’s a look inside Donald Trump’s $355 million civil fraud verdict as an appeals fight looms