Current:Home > FinanceUK lawmakers are annoyed that Abramovich’s frozen Chelsea funds still haven’t been used for Ukraine -MoneyTrend
UK lawmakers are annoyed that Abramovich’s frozen Chelsea funds still haven’t been used for Ukraine
View
Date:2025-04-16 06:08:02
U.K. lawmakers expressed frustration Wednesday that funds from the sale of the Chelsea soccer club have not yet gone to support Ukrainian war victims as had been promised nearly two years ago by the former owner, Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich.
Abramovich sold Chelsea in 2022 after being sanctioned by the British government for what it called his enabling of Russia’s “brutal and barbaric invasion” of Ukraine.
He pledged to donate the £2.5 billion ($3.2 billion) from the sale to victims of the war. But almost 20 months later, the funds are still frozen in a bank account in an apparent disagreement with the British government over how they should be spent. The stalemate highlights the difficulty for Western governments to use frozen assets for Ukraine — even those that have been pledged by their owner.
“We are all completely baffled and frustrated that it has taken so long,” said Lord Peter Ricketts, chair of the European Affairs Committee in the upper chamber of the U.K. parliament, which produced the report.
“We can’t understand why either Abramovich or the British government didn’t ensure that there was more clarity in the original undertaking which … would avoid arguments about exactly who in Ukraine would get this money,” Ricketts said.
The impasse “reflects badly on both Mr. Abramovich and the Government,” the report said.
The frozen funds still belong to Abramovich, who sold Chelsea to a consortium fronted by Los Angeles Dodgers part-owner Todd Boehly. To move the funds, Abramovich must apply for a license that the British government has said is contingent on the money being used for “exclusively humanitarian purposes in Ukraine.”
At the time of the sale, Abramovich said in a statement that the money would be transferred to a foundation — yet to be created — which would be “for the benefit of all victims of the war in Ukraine.”
That could include Ukrainians outside Ukraine, and lawmakers have heard evidence to suggest that Abramovich “also perhaps foresaw it being used in Russian controlled parts of Ukraine as well,” Ricketts said. He said the British government would veto any such move.
A former chief executive of Unicef UK, Mike Penrose, who was appointed to head the foundation that will control the funds when it is agreed they can be unfrozen, told The Associated Press that use of the money in Russian-occupied areas of Ukraine would not be permitted because it would contravene existing sanctions.
The terms of the agreement between the British government and Abramovich are not public but the deal foresaw the money being used to help those suffering from “the consequences of the Ukraine war,” Penrose said. That could include refugees in Europe as well as those suffering from food shortages in Africa following disruption to food supply routes, he said.
In December, Abramovich lost a challenge against the European Union’s decision to issue a travel ban and freeze his assets in the bloc. When the EU sanctioned Abramovich, it accused him of having “privileged access” to Russian President Vladimir Putin and of “maintaining very good relations with him.”
Abramovich has tried to carry out a balancing act since the war began, analysts say. He has positioned himself as a middleman between Russia and the West, facilitating prisoner swaps and — the Kremlin said in March 2022 — served as a mediator approved by Russia and Ukraine in negotiations.
“Of the high-profile oligarchs, Abramovich is the one who, over the last two years, has managed to successfully keep a foot in both camps,” said Tom Keatinge, director of the Centre for Financial Crime and Security Studies at the Royal United Services Institute in London.
Keatinge suggested that Abramovich might shy away from any arrangement in which all of the Chelsea funds are spent in territory controlled by the Ukrainian government — as opposed to humanitarian projects elsewhere — because that might put him in “conflict” with the Kremlin.
Penrose disagreed, saying he has not seen any indication that Abramovich was trying to steer the funds in a way that seeks “to curry favor with the Kremlin.”
Penrose said he hoped an agreement could be reached soon and suggested the funds are now stuck in a “bureaucratic hole,” because the U.K. had agreed with the E.U. that the funds could only be used for projects inside Ukraine.
Thus far, Western nations have struggled to use billions of dollars of sanctioned Russian sovereign or private assets to help Ukraine.
The Chelsea funds are an important “case study of the challenge that we face in trying to use frozen assets for the benefit of Ukraine,” Keatinge said.
An agreement between Abramovich and the British government could set “a precedent for others to be able to donate, in a voluntary way for humanitarian good in Ukraine,” Ricketts said.
In the report Wednesday, the U.K. lawmakers also recommended that the U.K government consider introducing a process for reviewing sanctions on individuals if they meet certain conditions, such as providing support for reconstruction of Ukraine.
___
Follow AP’s Russia-Ukraine coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine
veryGood! (42)
Related
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- LA County voters face huge decision on homeless services funding
- Troy Landry from 'Swamp People' cited following alligator hunting bust: Reports
- Padres warn fans about abusive behavior ahead of NLDS Game 3 against Dodgers
- Small twin
- The Office's Jenna Fischer Shares Breast Cancer Diagnosis
- Love Is Blind's Leo and Brittany Reveal Reason They Called Off Engagement
- Don’t count on a recount to change the winner in close elections this fall. They rarely do
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- How voting before Election Day became so widespread and so political
Ranking
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- In ‘Piece by Piece,’ Pharrell finds Lego fits his life story
- Education Pioneer Wealth Society: Your Partner in Wealth Growth
- Tropicana Field transformed into base camp ahead of Hurricane Milton: See inside
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Boxer Ryan Garcia gets vandalism charge dismissed and lecture from judge
- Padres warn fans about abusive behavior ahead of NLDS Game 3 against Dodgers
- Chrishell Stause and Paige DeSorbo Use These Teeth Whitening Strips: Score 35% Off on Prime Day
Recommendation
Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
Muggers ripped watch off Dodgers pitcher Walker Buehler’s arm, police say
The hunt for gasoline is adding to Floridians’ anxiety as Milton nears
Honolulu’s dying palms to be replaced with this new tree — for now
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Angel Dreamer Wealth Society: Empowering the Future, Together with Angel Dreamer
Chrishell Stause and Paige DeSorbo Use These Teeth Whitening Strips: Score 35% Off on Prime Day
Who is Jeff Ulbrich? New York Jets name DC interim head coach