Current:Home > NewsHow Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court -MoneyTrend
How Biden's latest student loan forgiveness differs from debt relief blocked by Supreme Court
Will Sage Astor View
Date:2025-04-09 00:57:51
Washington — The Biden administration announced Friday that it will wipe out $39 billion in student debt for more than 800,000 borrowers, relief that comes weeks after the Supreme Court invalidated a separate, broader effort by President Biden to address student loan debt.
Unlike the broad forgiveness Mr. Biden originally attempted to provide, the forthcoming debt discharges by the Department of Education are narrower, stemming from "fixes" announced by the administration in April 2022 to ensure borrowers enrolled in income-driven repayment plans have an accurate count of the number of monthly payments that go toward forgiveness.
The new student debt plan also relies on a different law than the one that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Under the 1965 Higher Education Act and federal regulations, a borrower is eligible for loan forgiveness after making 240 or 300 qualifying monthly payments — roughly 20 or 25 years of payments — on an income-driven repayment plan or standard repayment plan. The administration said "inaccurate payment counts" caused borrowers to lose "hard-earned progress" toward having their loans forgiven, which it has sought to remedy.
Loans covered include Direct Loans or Federal Family Education Loans held by the Department of Education, including Parent PLUS Loans.
The Supreme Court student loan decision
The latest announcement from the Department of Education is part of the Biden administration's efforts to provide relief to Americans with student loan debt, and is different from the program struck down by the Supreme Court late last month.
Under that plan, which the court's conservative majority said is unlawful, eligibility depended on income. Borrowers earning up to $125,000 annually could have up to $10,000 in student debt forgiven. Qualifying Pell Grant recipients, students with the greatest financial need, who met the income threshold could have had up to an additional $10,000 in relief.
That plan by the Biden administration was far more sweeping, with an estimated 40 million Americans eligible for relief, 20 million of whom would have had their loan balances erased.
The program also relied on a different law — the HEROES Act — than the loan discharges announced Friday. The HEROES Act authorizes the education secretary to "waive or modify" student financial assistance programs for borrowers "in connection" with a national emergency, such as the pandemic.
But the Supreme Court disagreed, finding the administration overstepped its authority with its plan to erase $430 billion in student debt.
The court also invoked the so-called "major questions" doctrine in part of its ruling, a legal theory that holds there must be clear congressional authorization for an executive branch agency to decide an issue of "vast economic or political significance."
The "economic and political significance" of the loan forgiveness plan, Roberts wrote, "is staggering by any measure." The court ruled that the education secretary could modify "existing statutory or regulatory provisions" under the Education Act, but "not to rewrite that statute from the ground up."
veryGood! (2189)
Related
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- 'Bachelorette' star's ex is telling all on TikTok: What happens when your ex is everywhere
- Data shows hurricanes and earthquakes grab headlines but inland counties top disaster list
- Holding out for a hero? Here are the 50 best, from Deadpool to Han Solo
- Small twin
- Attorneys for state of Utah ask parole board to keep death sentence for man convicted in 1998 murder
- Nordstrom Anniversary Sale 2024: The Best Deals on Accessories From Celine, Dagne Dover, Coach & More
- After key Baptist leader applauds Biden’s withdrawal, agency retracts announcement of his firing
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Conservatives use shooting at Trump rally to attack DEI efforts at Secret Service
Ranking
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- USA TODAY Sports Network's Big Ten football preseason media poll
- Stock market today: Asian shares are mixed after Wall Street breaks losing streak
- Plane crash kills two near EAA Airventure Oshkosh 2024 on first day
- Sam Taylor
- Emma Hayes realistic about USWNT work needed to get back on top of world. What she said
- Safety regulators are investigating another low flight by a Southwest jet, this time in Florida
- Why Hailey Bieber Chose to Keep Her Pregnancy Private for First 6 Months
Recommendation
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
Local sheriff says shots fired inside an Iowa mall
Hiker dies after running out of water near state park in sweltering heat
Ivan Cornejo weathers heartbreak on new album 'Mirada': 'Everything is going to be fine'
Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
As hurricane season begins, here’s how small businesses can prepare in advance of a storm
Man accused in killing of Tupac Shakur asks judge for house arrest instead of jail before trial
Olympic swimmers will be diving into the (dirty) Seine. Would you do it?